Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ category

What is the bid-opening procedure on HUD bids 4/14

April 25, 2014

    

  I.        – Unchanged: Length of the Exclusive listing period for FHA-uninsurable homes remains at 5 days. (As always, there are no investor bids during an Exclusive listing period.)

 

           II.        – Unchanged: Bids submitted on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday will be available to the Asset Manager on the same schedule as before, as long as one of those days (or Friday) is not a Federal Holiday.

 

          III.        – Unchanged: Bids for an earlier listing period are considered separately from bids from a later listing period. That is, any Exclusive listing period bids must be reviewed first and all of them canceled before bids from the Extended listing period would be made available to the Asset Manager to review.

 

·         Here’s what has changed:

 

             I.        – Exclusive listing period for FHA-insurable homes is 15 days instead of 30.

 

           II.        – Bids coming in on Friday, Saturday, or Sunday will be grouped together for the Asset Manager’s consideration on Monday.

 

          III.        – The 10-day bid-accumulation period at the beginning of the Exclusive period for FHA-insurable homes will be extended up to three days depending on whether the 10th day falls on a Friday, Saturday, or Sunday, and if there’s a Monday Federal holiday.
Note: This does not apply to the 5-day Exclusive bid-accumulation period for FHA-uninsurable homes since day 6 falls in the Extended listing period.

 

          IV.        – Bids coming in on a Federal holiday will be grouped with the previous days’ bids. For example, bids coming in on Martin Luther King Day (Monday) will be grouped with the preceding Friday, Saturday, and Sunday bids (if the listing period doesn’t change). And bids coming in on the Wednesday before Thanksgiving will be grouped with Thanksgiving’s bids, so the Asset Manager will be looking at two days’ bids on the Friday after Thanksgiving.

 

Rebuild credit after loan default in Alabama

May 16, 2013

By Tom Kelly Inman News

Our four children and their academic calendars have guided me through time in four-year blocks. For example: “Charley was a sophomore when that happened. He’s been out for two years so it must have been four years ago.”

That’s how I remembered my friend’s situation while visiting at a recent high-school game. It’s been four years since the man lost his longtime job, sold his house at a loss and then had to pay tax on the mortgage amount forgiven by the bank.

The net amount forgiven, $15,000, showed up as taxable income on the homeowner’s tax return.

A few months later, the Internal Revenue Service changed the law regarding debt forgiveness, allowing thousands of borrowers since then to avoid paying tax on a short sale or a foreclosure proceeding otherwise known as the “cancellation of indebtedness income.”

According to Everett resident Rob Keasal, a partner in the Seattle accounting firm of Peterson Sullivan LLP, the indebtedness relief benefit applies only on a primary residence — not second homes or investment properties — and is limited to the first $2 million of mortgage indebtedness on foreclosures on or after Jan. 1, 2007, and before Jan. 1, 2013.

The confusing part, however, is that refinances made between the time of purchase and foreclosure could cloud the waters.

For example, if you refinanced your loan and took cash out of the property to pay for cars, vacations and other real estate, the amount of your loan when it went into foreclosure could have been far greater than the original debt.

The relief limit stops at the amount of the original debt, minus what you have paid in principal. Money borrowed for capital improvements can be added to the original debt figure.

In other words, borrowers should look at the relief debt as purchase money debt, unless the refinance money was expressly used to improve the primary residence.

Many borrowers are now facing higher payments and possible default and foreclosure resulting from the upward adjustment of an adjustable-rate mortgage.

Whether it is a conventional adjustable-rate mortgage leaping to a higher rate, or a subprime loan tied to a high-interest-rate second mortgage and a prepayment penalty, the possibility of a home-sale loss or short sale is higher now than ever.

Given the occurrences of the past three years, many lenders will bend over backward to help borrowers who are behind. Some banks have long-standing alternative loan payment programs available while others have installed new packages.

Alternative programs for mortgage payments are typically lumped into one category: “forbearance.” Forbearance is not free, nor does it mean forgiveness.

It usually is a short-term agreement between borrower and lender permitting partial payments until normal payments can be resumed. Typically, forbearance agreements run three to six months.

Credit reports will show delinquent payments when full payments are not received. If you make partial forbearance payments for a short period, it’s best to petition credit bureaus to remove any “black marks” after full payment has been made. Explain the circumstances to the credit bureau in a letter to protect your future credit.

Forbearance does delay foreclosure, the process by which a homeowner who has not made timely payments of principal and interest on a mortgage loses title to the home. The foreclosure clock starts ticking once the borrower is in default.

A borrower technically is in default one day after a payment is due. However, most lenders do not mail the borrower a notice of default until two to three payments are missed.

Most mortgage bankers do not eagerly await a default on the family home. Lenders are in the business of loaning money and they do not wish to have your home back. It takes considerable time and money (about $100 a day) to manage and maintain foreclosures. Lenders would prefer to spend their energies on processing applications and recruiting customers.

My friend has landed a new job, is renting a nice home and plans one day to buy another house. Even if he were able to delay his home-sale loss to take advantage of the mortgage forgiveness law, it would have done nothing to help with his credit.

“You have to start over with the credit reporting agencies,” he said. “But having a job makes everything possible. It just will take a little time.”

Auburn University duplex for sale www.732YeagerLn.info

March 8, 2010
Play VisualTour

Three bedroom two bathroom duplex located on Tiger Transit route. Both sides have new carpet and are move in ready. Home Owners Association dues are $50/month for lawn maintenance. Approximately three parking places per side. All appliances in both units stay including washer and dryer. Both sides have ceramic tile in the hall, kitchen and baths, and carpet in the bedrooms and living room. See YouTube Video at; http://www.youtube.com/user/ScottELangley?feature=mhw4#p/c/5F60E00B84CEBA8F/15/KoaIRzs5TV0

DIRECTIONS: From Exit 51 towards campus on College St, turn left at Goo Goo Car Wash, Longleaf Crossing is on left. Turn left and then next right, duplex will be on the right.

Find more houses @
www.ScottELangley.com
www.ScottELangley.wordpress.com
www.facebook.com/ScottELangley   
www.twitter.com/ScottELangley
www.ustream.tv/ScottELangley
www.youtube.com/ScottELangley

March of Dimes March for Babies Kickoff Campaign in Auburn and Opelika

February 19, 2010
Tuesday, February 23 • 7:30 a.m. – 9 a.m. • EAMC Health Resource Center

 

Join us as we kickoff the East Alabama March for Babies campaign! When you take part in March for Babies, you give hope to the more than half a million babies born too soon each year. Corporate teams, family teams, youth teams and individuals are welcome to attend. Please RSVP by Monday, February 22 to Linda Gross at (334) 787-0693

 

 

The EAMC Health Resource Center is located at 2027 Pepperell Parkway.

Also find me @
www.facebook.com/ScottELangley
www.twitter.com/ScottELangley
www.youtube.com/ScottELangley
www.ustream.tv/ScottELangley
www.ScottELangley.com

Alabama Senate debating $1 billion roads program, will Auburn Opelika get any?

January 23, 2010

MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The Alabama Senate has spent a second day debating a proposal to spend $1 billion on road and bridge construction projects.

The legislation by Democratic Sen. Lowell Barron of Fyffe is the first major bill considered by the Senate this year. The debate began on Tuesday and continued Thursday for nearly two hours. The debate will resume Jan. 26.

Barron’s plan would take $100 million per year from a state savings account called the Alabama Trust Fund. The withdrawals would last for a decade, and the money would be used for road and bridge projects statewide.

Republican opponents say the state can’t afford to raid the trust fund. They say the trust fund is the state’s primary savings account and it must be protected.

www.ScottELangley.com

Exterior Remodeling Proves Best Bang for Your Buck, Realtors® Report

December 17, 2009

December 17, 2009

Despite a slow market and a slight decrease in the resale value of most remodeling projects, Realtors® report that the smartest home improvement investments may also be some of the least expensive. Results from the 2009 Remodeling Cost vs. Value Report show that small-scale exterior projects are the most profitable at resale, according to estimates by Realtors® who completed a recent survey.

On a national level, eight out of the top 10 projects in terms of costs recouped were exterior replacement projects that cost less than $14,000. Certain types of door and siding replacements, as well as wood deck additions all returned more than 80 percent of project costs upon resale. A steel entry door replacement – a new addition to this year’s list – recouped 128.9 percent of costs, followed by upscale fiber-cement sliding replacements at 83.6 percent. Wood deck additions recouped 80.6 percent of costs.

“Once again, this year’s Remodeling Cost vs. Value Report highlights the importance of a home’s first impression,” said NAR President Vicki Cox Golder, owner of Vicki L. Cox & Associates in Tucson, Ariz. “With exterior projects returning a high percent of project costs upon resale, Realtors® can help give your home curb appeal while adding value to the real estate transaction.

The 2009 Remodeling Cost vs. Value Report compares construction costs with resale values for 33 midrange and upscale remodeling projects comprising additions, remodels and replacements in 80 markets across the country. Data are grouped in nine U.S. regions, following the divisions established by the U.S. Census Bureau. This is the 12th consecutive year that the report, which is produced by Hanley Wood, LLC, was completed in cooperation with REALTOR® Magazine, as Realtors® provided their insight into local markets and buyer home preferences within those markets.

On a national level, the project with the biggest improvement from 2008 was the attic bedroom addition, recouping 83.1 percent of remodeling costs compared to 73.8 percent in 2008. The only other interior project that landed in the top 10 was a minor kitchen remodel with 78.3 percent costs recouped.

Other exterior projects in the top 10 include midrange vinyl and upscale foam-backed vinyl sliding replacements, which returned more than 79 percent of costs. In addition, several types of window replacements – midrange wood, midrange vinyl, and upscale vinyl – all returned more than 76 percent of costs upon sale.

Similar to last year’s report, the least profitable remodeling projects in terms of resale value were home office remodels and sunroom additions, returning only 48.1 percent and 50.7 percent of project costs.

Regionally, cities in the Pacific states of Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon and Washington once again outperformed the rest of the nation in terms of remodeling costs recouped upon resale. The West South Central region of Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas; the East South Central region of Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi and Tennessee; and the South Atlantic region of the District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia also performed relatively well.

Golder commented that remodeling projects are just one of many factors that contribute to a home’s overall resale value. “As the first, best source for real estate information, Realtors® are experts in providing insight into what projects and investments will make a difference in your house. It’s important to consult with a Realtor® who can explain the variety of factors that affect a home’s value, such as location, condition of surrounding properties and the regional economic climate,” she said.

Results of the report are summarized in the January issue of REALTOR® Magazine. To read the full project descriptions, access national and regional project data, and download a free PDF containing data for any of the 80 cities covered by the report, visit www.costvsvalue.com.  (after you click this link look towards the bottom left of  next page)“Cost vs. Value” is a registered trademark of Hanley Wood, LLC.